From the perspective of the majority of Indonesians the essence of the drama of the Middle East seems to be the presumed unfair Western support for Israeli oppression of fellow Muslims. On the other hand the most appalling aspect of the situation in the eyes of the majority of Westerners, the Dutch included, is the presumed lack of human rights in the Arab world.
Two small items on the same page in the miscellaneous section of my favorite newspaper illustrate the contrast. They are not directly connected to the Israeli – Palestine conflict, but to me they seem to be characteristic for the hopeless relation between the Arabs and Israel. The first one was on the Jewish Lobby in the US and the other one on the Saudi Arabian legal practice.
The first example may explain why it should be hard, except for the diehards, to be pro Israel.
Chas Freeman, who in the past criticized the Israeli oppression of Palestinians, was bound to be the new president of the National Intelligence Council. The NIC is an organization with considerable influence on the US foreign policy.
Now Freeman has been forced to withdraw his candidacy. He did so after the famous/notorious Israeli lobby had successfully launched a character assassination campaign against him.
That is scary.
The second example may explain why it should be hard, except for the diehards, to be pro Arabs.
A seventy five year ( 75 !) old widow has been sentenced by a Saudi Arabian court to four months imprisonment and forty lashes with the whip. The crime she committed was having contact, without chaperon, with two men who were not her relatives.
That is scary.
Both incidents do probably confirm the existing, overwhelming mutual distrust and prejudices. Both also probably contribute to the wish of third parties to turn their back on the problem – which in its turn would be at the expense of the victims.
Saudi Arabia… the country where woman is put into prison because they are raped by men.